A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: RE: The Implications.
 
Author: Cllr Laurence Mann
Date:   11/4/2001 7:56 pm WEDT
I have no idea what former Cllr Razzall may have said, nor what the question he was asked was. I try to avoid watching television as it is bad for the brain.

Nor have I any proof that the "Notes" produced are official ones: it is only because I have no evidence to the contrary and have heard of them before (maybe from reading something authored by yourself) that I am assuming that they are accurate. Some meeting must have taken place (maybe with former Cllr Razzall, maybe not)as otherwise the strategy of negotiation rather than fighting the appeal would not have been settled upon.

Everyone who is vaguely interested in this issue and looks at this site (maybe as many as a dozen people) has now seen all of the arguments. They may place whatsoever interpretation upon any facts or assertions which are contained within those arguments that they wish.

I have learnt a couple of things from this process, for which I am grateful. One is the correct amount of the compensation, and the other is that in reality you don't have a case at all, despite all of the bluster about the European Commission and the European Parliament.

I do hope we get an ice rink back some time, but it won't be as a result of your efforts to wind back the clock.
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Real Issues of Concern   new  
Richard Meacock 11/1/2001 5:35 am WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/1/2001 7:13 am WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Laurence Mann 11/1/2001 10:45 am WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Richard Meacock 11/1/2001 11:13 am WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Laurence Mann 11/1/2001 11:32 am WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/1/2001 11:54 am WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/1/2001 11:56 am WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Voter 11/1/2001 1:18 pm WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
In need of more help 11/1/2001 2:58 pm WEDT
 STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL   new  
J. Watley 11/2/2001 0:10 am WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/2/2001 11:59 am WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL?   new  
R H 11/2/2001 12:21 am WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL?   new  
Knowledgeable 11/2/2001 1:20 pm WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL?   new  
R H 11/2/2001 3:31 pm WEDT
 Still Waiting.   new  
R H 2/24/2002 6:36 pm WEDT
 RE: Still Waiting.   new  
Laurence Mann 2/25/2002 1:08 pm WEDT
 Minutes   new  
R H 2/25/2002 2:07 pm WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/2/2001 8:46 pm WEDT
 The Implications.   new  
R H 11/3/2001 2:49 pm WEDT
 RE: The Implications.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/3/2001 10:05 pm WEDT
 RE: The Implications.   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/4/2001 0:35 am WEDT
 RE: The Implications.   new  
RichardMeacock 11/4/2001 8:41 am WEDT
 RE: The Implications.    
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/4/2001 7:56 pm WEDT
 RE: The Implications.   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/4/2001 10:43 pm WEDT
 RE: The Implications.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/4/2001 7:46 pm WEDT
 RE: The Implications.   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/5/2001 0:35 am WEDT
 RE: The Implications.   new  
Richard Meacock 11/5/2001 7:55 am WEDT
 RE: The Implications.   new  
Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 11:27 am WEDT
 RE: The Implications.   new  
Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 10:38 am WEDT
 Statistics.   new  
R H 11/8/2001 3:55 pm WEDT
 RE: Statistics.   new  
Laurence Mann 11/9/2001 9:09 am WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL?   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/4/2001 0:05 am WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/4/2001 9:03 pm WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL   new  
Public Service Information 11/2/2001 8:37 pm WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL   new  
Knightsbridge LET Staff member 11/3/2001 10:23 am WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/4/2001 10:36 pm WEDT
 RE: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL   new  
Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 10:27 am WEDT
 Purpose?   new  
R H 11/8/2001 3:23 pm WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Laurence Mann 11/1/2001 3:14 pm WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/1/2001 4:47 pm WEDT
 RE: Real Issues of Concern   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/1/2001 8:07 pm WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 88 + 81? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.