A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: RE: Conflicts of Interest.
 
Author: Laurence Mann
Date:   10/31/2001 2:08 pm WEDT
1. This is typical of the sort of slur which issues so often on these pages. Given that this company is shrouded in so much mystery, we cannot have any idea who owns it, or who its directors are. Mr Harvey could be one for all I know. But it is unlikely.

If any councillor has failed to declare an interest he or she is in serious trouble.

Before anyone says that this is a good reason for not accepting an offer from such a company, I have two answers to that:

1. Even if councillors were involved with a purchaser, all that is necessary is for interests to be declared and for that councillor to take no part in the decision.

2. It is entirely possible to conceive of circumstances where a councillor who set out to deceive could ensure that any interest he or she had in any company was held on trust by a nominee. There is no need to go around looking for offshore companies.

As regards the RHP agreement, Gita, when she was involved in RHP matters, always used to leave the room and not vote when they came up in Council. Her signature was no doubt in her RHP capacity. There is nothing to stop a councillor having a contractual connection with the council, either in a personal or a trustee capacity, so long as it is declared and that decision does not involve that councillor.

For instance, I could not, as Chair of Orleans Park Governors, take part as a councillor in a decision which affected the school, but I could clearly sign a document as a Governor which involved the council.

Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Laurence Mann 10/26/2001 2:20 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
R H 10/26/2001 4:14 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Public Service Information 10/26/2001 5:27 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Trevor Clarke 10/26/2001 11:31 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Bob Parslow 10/27/2001 4:44 am WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
various pseudonyms 10/27/2001 5:41 am WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Solomon Green 10/27/2001 3:29 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/28/2001 8:51 pm WEDT
 Evidence?     
R H 10/29/2001 10:53 am WEDT
 RE: Evidence?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/29/2001 9:12 pm WEDT
 Every Council has it's price.     
R H 10/30/2001 1:04 pm WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.   new  
Solomon Green 10/30/2001 2:19 pm WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/30/2001 11:51 pm WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.   new  
Solomon Green 10/31/2001 10:48 am WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.   new  
Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 11:33 am WEDT
 Conflicts of Interest.   new  
R H 10/31/2001 11:37 am WEDT
 RE: Conflicts of Interest.    
Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 2:08 pm WEDT
 RE: Conflicts of Interest.   new  
R H 10/31/2001 3:41 pm WEDT
 RE: Conflicts of Interest.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 11:12 pm WEDT
 Clawback Review   new  
R H 11/1/2001 0:30 am WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review   new  
Laurence Mann 11/1/2001 9:54 am WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
R H 11/1/2001 12:00 am WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
Cllr Jonathan Cardy 11/1/2001 8:27 pm WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
R H 11/1/2001 11:01 pm WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
Richard Meacock 11/2/2001 8:36 am WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/2/2001 9:04 pm WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/30/2001 11:57 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/29/2001 9:37 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Cllr Jonathan Cardy 10/30/2001 2:04 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/30/2001 10:49 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Royal Mole 10/28/2001 7:17 am WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/28/2001 8:53 pm WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 5 - 4? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.