A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: RE: Every Council has it's price.
 
Author: Solomon Green
Date:   10/30/2001 2:19 pm WEDT
Come of it Cllr. Mann. You must know that the land registery will show that Hampton Court House is owned by Fredic. The question is and always has been "who owns Fredic?"

The rumour mill has it that the Lady who represents them in the UK was very close to one of your colleagues.

We have heard the rumour from a number of councillors, Labour, Conseravtive and Lib Dem and, also, from council employees. In the interst of those concerned, if the rumour is not true it should be denied. Although the rumour has been around for several years, I am not aware of any denial.

You must have heard the rumour yourself. Do you wish to deny it?

That is what the District Auditor was asked to investigate. He has said that it is no business of his to investigate the purchaser - even if it was Cllr. Mann himself.

For some reason he thinks that neither Richmond Council nor the District Auditor himself are subject to the money-laundering regulations.

Cllr. Mann, Do you know who owns Fredic? If so please tell us. If not please do not please tell us why you think it is unimportant. Do you relish doing deals with the Mafia or terrorists or tax-dodgers?

Do you not care that in selling to unknown persons the Council might be pocketing the proceeds of crime? Or do you not care?



Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Laurence Mann 10/26/2001 2:20 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
R H 10/26/2001 4:14 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Public Service Information 10/26/2001 5:27 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Trevor Clarke 10/26/2001 11:31 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Bob Parslow 10/27/2001 4:44 am WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
various pseudonyms 10/27/2001 5:41 am WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Solomon Green 10/27/2001 3:29 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/28/2001 8:51 pm WEDT
 Evidence?   new  
R H 10/29/2001 10:53 am WEDT
 RE: Evidence?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/29/2001 9:12 pm WEDT
 Every Council has it's price.   new  
R H 10/30/2001 1:04 pm WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.    
Solomon Green 10/30/2001 2:19 pm WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/30/2001 11:51 pm WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.   new  
Solomon Green 10/31/2001 10:48 am WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.   new  
Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 11:33 am WEDT
 Conflicts of Interest.   new  
R H 10/31/2001 11:37 am WEDT
 RE: Conflicts of Interest.   new  
Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 2:08 pm WEDT
 RE: Conflicts of Interest.   new  
R H 10/31/2001 3:41 pm WEDT
 RE: Conflicts of Interest.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 11:12 pm WEDT
 Clawback Review   new  
R H 11/1/2001 0:30 am WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review   new  
Laurence Mann 11/1/2001 9:54 am WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
R H 11/1/2001 12:00 am WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
Cllr Jonathan Cardy 11/1/2001 8:27 pm WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
R H 11/1/2001 11:01 pm WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
Richard Meacock 11/2/2001 8:36 am WEDT
 RE: Clawback Review, part two.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/2/2001 9:04 pm WEDT
 RE: Every Council has it's price.   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/30/2001 11:57 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?     
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/29/2001 9:37 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Cllr Jonathan Cardy 10/30/2001 2:04 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/30/2001 10:49 pm WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Royal Mole 10/28/2001 7:17 am WEDT
 RE: Should Laurence Mann shut up?   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/28/2001 8:53 pm WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 46 - 7? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.