A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann
 
Author: Cllr Laurence Mann
Date:   10/31/2001 11:05 pm WEDT

There are three possible sites. I say "possible" but must attach a health warning that in order to achieve any of these would require possible changes to the UDP and finalising of all kinds of detail.

One is, of course, the Pools on the Park site. There are formidable problems here, mainly associated with access arrangements and no doubt residents' objections.

The second is the Hampton Waterworks site. Officers are working on a planning brief at the moment. I have no idea what they will come up with, but it is a big site, and maybe a leisure facility within it might be something worth looking at.

There are also problems here. Part of the site is green belt, and there are extensive areas given over to buildings which are worth preserving.

The third, which is even more speculative, might be the Post Office site in Twickenham.

Of course development of an ice rink upon any of these would be competing with other possible uses.

I have no idea of what operational constraints play upon the choice of a site for an ice rink. But waiting until any or all of these sites are the subject of a competing application will be a mistake.
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Richard Meacock 10/29/2001 6:13 am WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/29/2001 9:06 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Public Service Information 10/29/2001 9:50 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Richard Meacock 10/30/2001 5:03 am WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Trevor Clarke 10/30/2001 6:45 am WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Richard Meacock 10/30/2001 8:22 am WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Knowledgeable 10/30/2001 9:59 am WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Richard Meacock 10/30/2001 2:19 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Laurence Mann 10/30/2001 3:25 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Richard Meacock 10/30/2001 9:19 pm WEDT
 The points of contention:   new  
R H 10/31/2001 11:20 am WEDT
 RE: The points of contention:     
Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 1:49 pm WEDT
 The Rub.   new  
R H 10/31/2001 3:22 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Mr Meacock   new  
Helpful 10/31/2001 12:02 am WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Mr Meacock   new  
Helped 10/31/2001 12:43 am WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Mr Meacock     
Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 2:12 pm WEDT
 Provision.   new  
R H 10/31/2001 3:12 pm WEDT
 RE: Provision.   new  
Helpless 10/31/2001 4:12 pm WEDT
 RE: Provision.   new  
R H 10/31/2001 5:02 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Laurence Mann 10/30/2001 3:07 pm WEDT
 Manor Road; what really happened:   new  
R H 10/30/2001 12:35 am WEDT
 RE: Manor Road; what really happened:   new  
Laurence Mann 10/30/2001 3:33 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
perplexed voter 10/30/2001 2:31 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 11:55 am WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Richard Meacock 10/31/2001 2:45 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Knowledgeable 10/31/2001 3:34 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Trevor Clarke 10/31/2001 4:00 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann    
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 11:05 pm WEDT
 RE: QUESTION TIME Cllr. Mann   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 10/31/2001 10:52 pm WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 72 - 16? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.