A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: RE: Public scrutiny and standards
 
Author: Trevor Clarke
Date:   11/8/2001 11:38 am WEDT
I mentioned in the original posting about Henry McLeish, First Minister for Scotland coming under close scrutiny, which revolved around a sub let of official use offices and not declared. The amount of 'gain' mentioned on last Thursday's BBC Question Time was £9,000, which Henry McLeish had offered to pay back.

Today, he has announced his resignation and there are five points worth making.

1. The facts have been squeezed out little by little and the amount in question has since risen to £36,000.
2. Henry McLeish has felt forced to resign due to intense pressure after this revelation, showing that he had been 'economical with the truth'.
3. The combination of dishonesty, deviousness,and cover ups, followed by close scrutiny, constant and increasing pressure, finally brought him down.
4. It adds another reason to why we are less inclined to believe all the denials from councillors and officals of all wrongdoings, against such a huge tide of, let's call them 'suspicious events and circumstances'.
5. To all suspects out there - be sure your sins will find you out! (Eventually).
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/2/2001 1:06 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Knowledgeable 11/2/2001 1:30 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Richard Meacock 11/2/2001 2:35 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Knowledgeable 11/2/2001 2:50 pm WEDT
 Why?   new  
R H 11/2/2001 3:14 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/2/2001 3:41 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Solomon Green 11/3/2001 3:59 pm WEDT
 Who?   new  
R H 11/2/2001 3:25 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/2/2001 9:10 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/3/2001 9:52 am WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
RichardMeacock 11/3/2001 10:43 am WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/3/2001 9:46 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/3/2001 11:35 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/4/2001 7:37 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/4/2001 10:08 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 8:56 am WEDT
 Hypocrisy   new  
R H 11/5/2001 10:59 am WEDT
 RE: Opposition   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/5/2001 11:43 am WEDT
 RE: Opposition   new  
R H 11/5/2001 12:19 am WEDT
 RE: Opposition   new  
Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 1:08 pm WEDT
 Rents   new  
R H 11/5/2001 6:02 pm WEDT
 RE: Rents   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 8:43 pm WEDT
 RE: Opposition   new  
Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 1:03 pm WEDT
 RE: Opposition   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/5/2001 9:56 pm WEDT
 RE: Hypocrisy   new  
Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 1:00 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/5/2001 0:13 am WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 9:04 am WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
In the know 11/5/2001 2:51 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 3:37 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Knowledgeable 11/5/2001 3:40 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/5/2001 4:05 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/5/2001 8:55 pm WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards    
Trevor Clarke 11/8/2001 11:38 am WEDT
 RE: Public scrutiny and standards   new  
RichardMeacock 11/8/2001 12:05 am WEDT
 ????   new  
R H 11/8/2001 2:23 pm WEDT
 RE: ????   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/8/2001 4:37 pm WEDT
 RE: ????   new  
R H 11/8/2001 8:49 pm WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 82 + 74? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.