A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: RE: Its a small world
 
Author: Law School Fresher
Date:   11/22/2001 8:37 am WEDT
Thank you Solomon Green. A few further queries

>Ex Cllr Razzall failed to declare his interest in Cala some years ago when that company was developing a £2.5 million property in Teddington. Afterwards he said that neither he nor his wife held more than 1/2% of the capital of Cala. 1/2% of the company was worth, at that time, £500,000.

Is that a mistake. If 1/2% was worth £500,000 then the whole was worth £100 million ?

>You can look this up in the Council Minutes where the matter was raised and where his friends ruled that it was up to an individual Councillor as to whether he wished to declare an interst or not.

Are there not national guidelines on these matters ?

>His relationship with LET and the Beckwith brothers is more tenuous but John Gunn, the Beckwiths' associate in developing Riverside Rackets Club, was responsible for injecting a large sum of money into Razzall's company Abaco at a price substantially higher than the then market value, which had the effect of saving that company and adding considerably to the ex-councillor's worth.

Is the cash-injection a matter of public record ? Are you suggesting any illegality here ?

Law School Fresher
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Its a small world   new  
Sheen Gumshoe 11/21/2001 12:59 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
law school tutor 11/21/2001 1:37 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Solomon Green 11/21/2001 5:45 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world    
Law School Fresher 11/22/2001 8:37 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Sheen Gumshoe 11/22/2001 7:02 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Law School Tutor 11/22/2001 8:25 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Richard Meacock 11/22/2001 8:55 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Law School Fresher 11/22/2001 8:57 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Solomon Green 11/22/2001 10:23 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Law School Fresher 11/22/2001 11:00 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Richard Meacock 11/22/2001 12:43 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Law School Fresher 11/22/2001 12:58 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world PS   new  
Law School Fresher 11/22/2001 1:05 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world PS   new  
Richard Meacock 11/22/2001 1:09 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Laurence Mann 11/22/2001 2:24 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Law School Fresher 11/22/2001 2:55 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/22/2001 10:28 pm WEDT
 Collective Responsibility/Amnesia   new  
Law School Fresher 11/23/2001 8:46 am WEDT
 RE: Collective Responsibility/Amnesia   new  
Laurence Mann 11/23/2001 10:53 am WEDT
 An ever smaller world   new  
R H 11/23/2001 10:47 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
anon 11/22/2001 2:42 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/28/2001 0:07 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Laurence Mann 11/28/2001 8:31 am WEDT
 Members' Interests   new  
R H 11/28/2001 9:22 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Solomon Green 11/28/2001 5:15 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/28/2001 8:59 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Solomon Green 11/29/2001 9:44 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Richard Meacock 11/29/2001 10:13 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
anon 11/29/2001 10:35 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Laurence Mann 11/29/2001 11:09 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Richard Meacock 11/29/2001 11:27 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Laurence Mann 11/29/2001 1:56 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Richard Meacock 11/29/2001 3:41 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Laurence Mann 11/30/2001 9:58 am WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Laurence Mann 12/4/2001 8:55 pm WEDT
 RE: Its a small world   new  
Laurence Mann 12/10/2001 9:56 pm WEDT
 Oozle, Bird, White, Wash and Co.   new  
R H 11/29/2001 11:38 am WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 73 - 64? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.