A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: Data protection?
 
Author: R H
Date:   12/3/2001 0:23 am WEDT

I can hardly believe that anybody could be so lamentably lame, so abysmally stupid and yet so arrogantly pompous.

I happened to go to two of the schools in the vicinity some years ago. (Orleans Infants and St Stephen's Junior)

I recall that they'd already invented a very effective consultation mechanism. It was often used for many purposes:

With appropriate instructions given, the teachers would hand whatever printed material to the pupils. The pupils would take it home.

Very simple. Very effective. No problem.

With best wishes,

Ron Harvey
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Voter ignorance   new  
Kenneth Rice 11/22/2001 7:06 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Active but Ignorant Voter 11/22/2001 8:55 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/22/2001 10:34 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Kenneth Rice 11/23/2001 6:57 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cheeky 11/23/2001 8:34 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Active but Ignorant Voter 11/23/2001 8:38 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Anna Brown 11/25/2001 8:11 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Richard Meacock 11/26/2001 10:14 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Friend of Richard Meacock 11/26/2001 12:38 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Friend of Cornwell 11/26/2001 3:27 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
We the undersigned... 11/26/2001 4:00 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance PS   new  
We the undersigned... 11/26/2001 5:04 pm WEDT
 Friend of Cornwell?   new  
R H 11/26/2001 8:29 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/27/2001 11:05 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Laurence Mann 11/28/2001 8:55 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Anthony P Berend 12/2/2001 10:40 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 12/2/2001 11:15 pm WEDT
 Data protection?    
R H 12/3/2001 0:23 am WEDT
 RE: Data protection?   new  
Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 9:40 am WEDT
 Not infrequent?   new  
R H 12/3/2001 10:31 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Trevor Clarke 12/3/2001 11:35 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Cllr Trevor Whittall 12/3/2001 12:13 am WEDT
 RE: School & Parent Consultation   new  
Trevor Clarke 12/3/2001 4:12 pm WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 12:46 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 12:47 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cllr Trevor Whittall 12/3/2001 12:43 am WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 58 + 84? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.