A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
Go to Top  |  New Topic  |  Go to Topic  |  Search 
 Subject: RE: Voter ignorance
 
Author: We the undersigned...
Date:   11/26/2001 4:00 pm WEDT
We the undersigned feel we must be anonymous, the pseudonyms are really just different ways of describing one person according to context. We hope that in so doing we have added a degree of humour to this site. We haven't engaged in personal abuse or unsubstantiated allegation, We try and stick to brief and humorous comments or honest questions.

The site does offer temptations to create multiple characters, but we've avoided the temptation to engage in dialogue with ourselves.

Cheeky
Active but Ignorant Voter
Active Voter
One of more than one Bystanders and General Nuisances
and others
Reply To This Message
 Previous Message  |  Next Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Voter ignorance   new  
 Kenneth Rice 11/22/2001 7:06 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Active but Ignorant Voter 11/22/2001 8:55 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Cllr Laurence Mann 11/22/2001 10:34 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Kenneth Rice 11/23/2001 6:57 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Cheeky 11/23/2001 8:34 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Active but Ignorant Voter 11/23/2001 8:38 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Anna Brown 11/25/2001 8:11 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Richard Meacock 11/26/2001 10:14 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Friend of Richard Meacock 11/26/2001 12:38 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance     
 Friend of Cornwell 11/26/2001 3:27 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance    
 We the undersigned... 11/26/2001 4:00 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance PS   new  
 We the undersigned... 11/26/2001 5:04 pm WEDT
 Friend of Cornwell?   new  
 R H 11/26/2001 8:29 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Anthony P Berend 11/27/2001 11:05 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Laurence Mann 11/28/2001 8:55 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Anthony P Berend 12/2/2001 10:40 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance     
 Cllr Laurence Mann 12/2/2001 11:15 pm WEDT
 Data protection?   new  
 R H 12/3/2001 0:23 am WEDT
 RE: Data protection?   new  
 Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 9:40 am WEDT
 Not infrequent?   new  
 R H 12/3/2001 10:31 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
 Trevor Clarke 12/3/2001 11:35 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
 Cllr Trevor Whittall 12/3/2001 12:13 am WEDT
 RE: School & Parent Consultation   new  
 Trevor Clarke 12/3/2001 4:12 pm WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
 Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 12:46 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
 Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 12:47 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
 Cllr Trevor Whittall 12/3/2001 12:43 am WEDT
 Previous Topic  |  Next Topic
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 86 - 84? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.