A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: RE: Voter ignorance
 
Author: Active but Ignorant Voter
Date:   11/22/2001 8:55 am WEDT
I'm so ingorant I don't even know who you mean by Cllr. Barnowl. If someone could set up a web-site giving VERIFIABLE information, such as Disqualifications, Councillor's interests etc. I'm sure it would reach quite a few voters. If public domain information is made readily available to all, we can draw our own conclusions. (Sources are a prime requirement in academia )I understand that 60% of Richmond Residents now have access to the Net.

Hopefully the Internet will enhance Democracy, maybe Watchdog is a part of that process.

Active but Ignorant Voter
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Voter ignorance   new  
Kenneth Rice 11/22/2001 7:06 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance    
Active but Ignorant Voter 11/22/2001 8:55 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/22/2001 10:34 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Kenneth Rice 11/23/2001 6:57 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cheeky 11/23/2001 8:34 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Active but Ignorant Voter 11/23/2001 8:38 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Anna Brown 11/25/2001 8:11 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance     
Richard Meacock 11/26/2001 10:14 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Friend of Richard Meacock 11/26/2001 12:38 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Friend of Cornwell 11/26/2001 3:27 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
We the undersigned... 11/26/2001 4:00 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance PS   new  
We the undersigned... 11/26/2001 5:04 pm WEDT
 Friend of Cornwell?   new  
R H 11/26/2001 8:29 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/27/2001 11:05 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Laurence Mann 11/28/2001 8:55 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Anthony P Berend 12/2/2001 10:40 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 12/2/2001 11:15 pm WEDT
 Data protection?   new  
R H 12/3/2001 0:23 am WEDT
 RE: Data protection?   new  
Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 9:40 am WEDT
 Not infrequent?   new  
R H 12/3/2001 10:31 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Trevor Clarke 12/3/2001 11:35 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Cllr Trevor Whittall 12/3/2001 12:13 am WEDT
 RE: School & Parent Consultation   new  
Trevor Clarke 12/3/2001 4:12 pm WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 12:46 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 12:47 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cllr Trevor Whittall 12/3/2001 12:43 am WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 94 - 63? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.