A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: RE: Voter ignorance
 
Author: Anthony P Berend
Date:   11/27/2001 11:05 pm WEDT

Please Please - pseudonyms should be the exception not the norm.

We can accept that Council "moles" must use a pseudonym.

Others have normally no need unless to deceive which is usually pretty obvious. [There have been a number of very silly postings by clearly Lib Dem members { probably Councillors}]

Secondly to protect the writer from a slander action.

Two points

If you post slander and insults under a pseudonym all you do is to reduce the credibility of the site.

PLEASE PLEASE don't do it.

The very fact that the site is unedited is of great value.

For others who fear letters from Goodman Derrick [acting for Williams and Razzall] - do not worry they never take action. It is just a threat. They would not dare. For if they did we would go for "discovery".

It is to use a quote from Councillor Williams "It is just a dirty political game".

By the way Councillor Williams when are you going to apologise to the Public for giving false information to the Press? "There is no report. It is just a dirty political game".

You will and publicly I promise.


Anthony P Berend


PS Will the Council’s monitor of this site please see
that Cllr Williams is aware of this posting. –

They have one - we are all paying his salary.
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Voter ignorance   new  
Kenneth Rice 11/22/2001 7:06 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Active but Ignorant Voter 11/22/2001 8:55 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/22/2001 10:34 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Kenneth Rice 11/23/2001 6:57 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cheeky 11/23/2001 8:34 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Active but Ignorant Voter 11/23/2001 8:38 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Anna Brown 11/25/2001 8:11 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Richard Meacock 11/26/2001 10:14 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Friend of Richard Meacock 11/26/2001 12:38 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Friend of Cornwell 11/26/2001 3:27 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
We the undersigned... 11/26/2001 4:00 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance PS   new  
We the undersigned... 11/26/2001 5:04 pm WEDT
 Friend of Cornwell?   new  
R H 11/26/2001 8:29 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance    
Anthony P Berend 11/27/2001 11:05 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Laurence Mann 11/28/2001 8:55 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Anthony P Berend 12/2/2001 10:40 pm WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 12/2/2001 11:15 pm WEDT
 Data protection?   new  
R H 12/3/2001 0:23 am WEDT
 RE: Data protection?   new  
Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 9:40 am WEDT
 Not infrequent?   new  
R H 12/3/2001 10:31 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Trevor Clarke 12/3/2001 11:35 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Cllr Trevor Whittall 12/3/2001 12:13 am WEDT
 RE: School & Parent Consultation   new  
Trevor Clarke 12/3/2001 4:12 pm WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 12:46 am WEDT
 RE: Not infrequent?   new  
Laurence Mann 12/3/2001 12:47 am WEDT
 RE: Voter ignorance   new  
Cllr Trevor Whittall 12/3/2001 12:43 am WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 1 + 84? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.