A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: RE: Resignation of Chief Exec
 
Author: active voter
Date:   10/28/2001 8:31 pm WEDT
In reply to Solomon Green

I'd question the use of 'only' in 'only three'. The remarks about council employees, including the strategic director are a substantial part of the allegations. If any part of them is verified it's fairly serious. Are disqualified directors listed ?

It seems perfectly possible that Owl's allegations are all true. However hard evidence may be needed to convince a wider public.

I do wonder that I don't read too much about this in the Conservatives' leaflet 'In Touch' (Labour doesn't deliver leaflets in my neck of the woods.)

Active Voter
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Resignation of Chief Exec   new  
Owl with the view 10/28/2001 4:13 pm WEDT
 RE: Resignation of Chief Exec   new  
active voter 10/28/2001 6:00 pm WEDT
 RE: Resignation of Chief Exec   new  
Solomon Green 10/28/2001 7:46 pm WEDT
 RE: Resignation of Chief Exec    
active voter 10/28/2001 8:31 pm WEDT
 RE: Resignation of Chief Exec   new  
R H 10/29/2001 11:25 am WEDT
 RE: Resignation of Chief Exec   new  
Trevor Clarke 10/28/2001 10:25 pm WEDT
 RE: Resignation of Chief Exec   new  
Solomon Green 10/29/2001 10:57 am WEDT
 RE: Resignation of Chief Exec   new  
R H 10/29/2001 11:34 am WEDT
 RE: Resignation of Chief Exec   new  
Anthony P Berend 10/30/2001 10:06 pm WEDT
 RE: Resignation of Chief Exec   new  
Anon 10/31/2001 5:43 pm WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 9 + 63? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.