A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
Go to Top  |  New Topic  |  Go to Topic  |  Search 
 Subject: Water Tight?
 
Author: R H
Date:   11/7/2001 11:05 am WEDT

Really?

How much would you wager against anybody here managing to demonstrate other errors?

Meacock sang your praises (Fri 19/10/2001 16:12).

The story he was so keen on was about consultation. It cited other Councils' practice regarding speeches to Committees. Were the facts you gave on that properly researched or were they regurgitated from somewhere else?

If you ever find the time to make a proper job of that I would be interested to see the results. I happen to know something about what does go on elsewhere.

With best wishes,
Ron Harvey
Reply To This Message
 Previous Message  |  Next Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Owl with the View 10/28/2001 4:21 pm WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Trevor Clarke 10/28/2001 10:06 pm WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Richard Meacock 10/29/2001 6:26 am WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Richard Meacock 10/30/2001 10:40 am WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Richard Meacock 10/30/2001 10:40 am WEDT
 RE: R&T Informer compared to R&T Times   new  
 Trevor Clarke 10/30/2001 11:45 am WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Anthony P Berend 10/30/2001 11:22 pm WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Knowledgeable 10/31/2001 7:32 am WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 perplexed voter 10/31/2001 10:18 am WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 R H 10/31/2001 11:29 am WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Trevor Clarke 10/31/2001 11:38 am WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Eve McGowan 11/6/2001 9:22 am WEDT
 RE: Richmond & Twickenham Comments   new  
 Trevor Clarke 11/6/2001 11:15 am WEDT
 Water Tight?    
 R H 11/7/2001 11:05 am WEDT
 running order   new  
 Bob Parslow 11/30/2001 4:15 pm WEDT
 Previous Topic  |  Next Topic
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 80 + 86? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.