A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: Bogus wesite claims
 
Author: Debbi Kellehar
Date:   10/5/2001 11:06 am WEDT
I am a web site designer and I live in the borough, in Barnes. I totally agree with the recent correspondence on this Watchdog about the awful state of Richmond Council's web site. It is a very poorly made and managed site which has been offline more than it has been online this year. For months now I have been seeing on the home page they have two banners claiming website accolades. One is a Nominated banner for a New Statesman award and the other is a shortlist banner for the Spin award. These are really embarassing and each time I visit the site I have been hoping they would have been removed. But not so, they remain a testament to Council ignorance.

As anyone with an elementary knowledge of web production will tell you, these banners are utterly meaningless. They are not awards Richmond.gov has won. It is an insult to the people of Richmond Borough to keep such banners online and pretend it is an achievement. Richmond.gov was probably nominated by someone in their IT dept as I cant see anyone else having the audacity to nominate it. Any individual can nominate a site so thousands are nominated for New Statesman awards, you celebrate if you win an award not if you are nominated. These banners have been on the Richmond.gov homepage for ages. The awards were judged months ago and of course Richmond didn't win, they couldn't possibly get anything, not even runner-up. For goodness sake Council, have some decency and remove these embarassments. The level of ignorance in Richmond Council about almost everything is astounding.

Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Bogus wesite claims    
Debbi Kellehar 10/5/2001 11:06 am WEDT
 RE: Bogus wesite claims   new  
In the know 10/5/2001 12:55 am WEDT
 RE: Bogus wesite claims   new  
Solomon Green 10/5/2001 12:57 am WEDT
 RE: Bogus wesite claims   new  
anorak 10/5/2001 2:37 pm WEDT
 RE: Bogus wesite claims   new  
nerd 10/5/2001 2:59 pm WEDT
 RE: Bogus wesite claims   new  
Anthony P Berend 10/6/2001 8:52 am WEDT
 RE: Bogus wesite claims   new  
Peter Keogh 10/8/2001 11:55 am WEDT
 Search Engines   new  
R H 10/6/2001 9:08 am WEDT
 RE: Search Engines   new  
nerd 10/6/2001 3:33 pm WEDT
 RE: Search Engines   new  
R H 10/7/2001 8:32 am WEDT
 RE: Search Engines   new  
nerd 10/7/2001 2:33 pm WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 63 + 70? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.