A profanity filter is employed. Please use a valid e-mail with your message and a valid name if at all possible. Please keep to the posters subject.
RICHMOND WATCHDOG OPEN FORUM
 Subject: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocrisy
 
Author: Trevor Clarke
Date:   11/9/2001 11:37 am WEDT
A line I've seen quoted a number of times from councillors anfd officials, and Cllr Serge Lourie last week in the R&T Times, is that they must take into account 'the majority, not just the vocal minority'. Can he therefore explain part of the reasoning for not flying the American flag over York House on 27th November to "Not cause offence to some of our Muslim residents". Where does the majority view come into the decision? Why the exception when Kingston and Hounslow (with a far higher muslim population) have agreed to fly their flag? Another example of being totally out of touch?

The vicar of St Andrew's Church request for war veterans not to bear standards at the rememberance day service is "Out of respect for the German protestant members of his congregation." Many issues around that one but let's stick with, how many of them are there, and should the respect not be coming from the other way on this?

It seems to me that when it suits, the establishment and politicians claim they are acting for the 'majority' and at other times, selectively, they will take more note of the 'minority'. Another example of sham democracy, skewed principles and hyprocrisy.
Reply To This Message

 Topics Author  Date      
 Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocrisy    
Trevor Clarke 11/9/2001 11:37 am WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Cllr Trevor Whittall 11/9/2001 1:10 pm WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Cllr Trevor Whittall 11/9/2001 1:37 pm WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/9/2001 2:34 pm WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/9/2001 8:16 pm WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/11/2001 4:28 pm WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/12/2001 1:15 am WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/12/2001 9:59 pm WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/12/2001 7:42 am WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Cllr Laurence Mann 11/12/2001 10:22 pm WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/12/2001 11:17 pm WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Laurence Mann 11/13/2001 9:27 am WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Trevor Clarke 11/13/2001 7:39 am WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Cllr Trevor Whittall 11/13/2001 9:09 am WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Laurence Mann 11/13/2001 9:38 am WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Anthony P Berend 11/13/2001 12:36 am WEDT
 RE: Democracy , Skewed Principles, & Hyprocris   new  
Laurence Mann 11/13/2001 1:00 pm WEDT
 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:  
 Your Email:  
 Subject:  
  Submission Validation Question: What is 76 - 73? *  
* indicates required field
     

Sexist, Racist, Rude or unnecessary messages will be removed. Tolerance to anonymous messages will be at the discretion of the administration body. Anyone who insults the owner of this forum will be barred for life. No adverts permitted.